A real defamation from that oh-so-pure Climate Audit:
achuara Posted Jul 18, 2012 at 4:11 PM Permalink |
what about if the “criminals are brought to justice” along with Phil Jones,
Mann and the merry bunch? But all boils down to emails and the data released or
hacked have not been shown to be altered, or xxxxx –and that is the crux of the
issue. They have been xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx data in the Hadley Center
for decades, in a clear xxxxxxxx use of public money. But the issue seems to be
it was not a leak but a hack! Give me a break!
For my protection I have decided to remove the worst defamatory words - republishing is as bad a initial publishing
I, for one, don’t believe everything that the police say, just because they say
The “hack,” if it was a crime, was clearly one of conscience or, if you
prefer, an act of civil disobedience. If Mosher and Fuller say it was someone
(or more than one) with connections to the CRU, then it’s more likely than not
that that is true
Mosher is more reliable than the police!
Too bad that they didn’t provide any evidence to actually dispel the theory that
RC/FOIA “was a disgruntled UEA employee”.
18, 2012 at 3:53 PM Permalink |
According to Richard Black, Michael Mann has urged that “criminals be brought
Peter Gleick was apparently unavailable for comment.
UEA has called the police in to investigate a criminal event (Computer Misuse Act) The police accept that a crime has been committed.
No one has charged Gleick with a criminal act - this is in the hands of Heartland
The whole of the blog has turned to innuendo, conspiracy theories and defamatory comments.
The blocking of comments to these denialist blogs has become an art form - wordpress must have got some damn fine filtering available to them. It is becoming frustrating!
Isn’t this also kind of an own goal?
59 minutes ago