Showing posts with label hate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hate. Show all posts

2017/06/02

What Roy Spencer Thinks of Europe

Just seen an exchange of posts on Spencer's Blog

stavro mueller says:
Salvatore Del Prete says: June 2, 2017 at 5:50 AM
Trump you did the right thing ! Excellent president the best we have ever had.
————
Really?
few other leaders have been made the ultimate laughing stock of the rest of the world.
Even Bush and Regan were more respected
  • I don’t care if we are a laughingstock to a bunch of countries whose claim to fame is artists and musicians who died hundreds of years ago. Some of us laugh at you, too. Your countries are slowly dying, culturally and economically.
    Good luck.
phew!

2016/05/14

Yet more Hyped up FOI'd Emails - George Mason University

Such invalid posts on blogs and the CEI site:

CEI

National Campaign led by AG’s to Use RICO Against ‘Climate Skeptics’ will be Revealed in Released E-mails

GWPF

RICO-20 Campaign Against Sceptical Climate Scientists Revealed In Emails

WUWT

BREAKING: CEI Defeats RICO-20 Ringleader Shukla In FOIA Lawsuit – Emails to be are made public

First a look at wuwt:
Watts comment in the editorial (in red)



And from one of his minions (not towing the line)



So what is the correct thing to do go private and "circumvent" foi???

What's it all about.
Well it seems to be about supporting a RICO case against corporations (in a similar attack made on tobacco firms who initially denied that nicotine was addictive and claimed tobacco smoking was not harmful)

So where does an attack on climate change dissenters come into this? Its certainly not obvious to me! What it looks like is a way to get corporations to come clean about what they know about climate change and fossil fuels, and to do it under oath facing a judge.

What do those people supporting the RICO case say - which dissenting climate scientists are they trying to muzzle. Let's see an email:

How have some of these dissenters who have NOT been attacked respond:

Strange that it is more like the dissenters are trying to muzzle the  RICO 20 right to free speech!

So how is this being taken by the public:



And the hate gets so bad that Prof Jagadish Shukla begins to think he should retract the letter but is convinced he should let it roll:


What is it all about?
The letter in question does not suggest criminalising climate change dissenters.
RICO is a fact finding rather than criminal investigation.


Still if you shout falsehoods loudly enough on the web your words will be heard by millions and repeated as true facts -

RULE BY THE SIZE OF YOUR WEB BLOG READERSHIP not by Democracy.





2014/03/16

How to Talk to a Climate Change Dissenter

So much of the dissenter blogosphere is taken up with how despicable it is to use the term deniers (which some how, to them means Holocaust deniers)




I have refrained from using the term deniers as it does not help discussion but only diverts it to a blind alley).


However calling them "sceptics" is just so wrong! they cannot be considered sceptical unless they are, at least, willing to consider that climate change is real. Most certainly deny this possibility.




However, a link from Variable Variability (Victor Venema)
http://variable-variability.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/climate-dissenters-like-climate-change.html


Seemed very sensible:


How to talk to a climate change denier





Not much in the way of visuals so just listen!




2012/09/23

Watts & Co Misuse of Blogs

 
"THEY" talk about corruption of peer review
"THEY" talk about climate scientists forcing publication editors to resign.
 
"THEY" find it quite ok trying to destroy a scientists reputation because they disagree with his results - DESPICABLE, TWO-FACED ... etc. etc.
From CA
  • Anthony Watts
    Posted Sep 22, 2012 at 10:15 AM | Permalink | Reply
    for those that are keeping track, and wish to register a complaint on the statistical methodology being faulty (not to mention the sampling) you can contact:
    Professor Robyn Owens
    Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research)
    The University of Western Australia, M460
    35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009
    [full phone email details were included here]
    • Posted Sep 22, 2012 at 2:14 PM | Permalink | Reply
      Your comment is awaiting moderation. well done watts trial by blog is an ideal way to improve science
    • HAS
      Posted Sep 22, 2012 at 3:53 PM | Permalink | Reply
      Another way in is through the funding agency. L. is part funded through a Discovery Australia Linkage Project LP120100224 “Creating a climate for change: from cognition to consensus” (you can find details of the Australian Research Council site). The administering organisation is the University of NSW who have a contract with the ARC for this funding (the generic contract is on the ARC site). Ben R Newell Assoc Prof @NSW is likely the lead.
      Anyway there a number of points in the ARC contract that are possible breached by L. et al. and the associated publicity around it. A quick scan suggests that those climate sceptics that feel aggrieved should review clause 18.4 and 18.6 of the funding contract that reference the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research (2007) (also available at the ARC web site).
      The sections dealing with conflict of interest (L. other blog interests); respect for research participants; reporting results; and communicating research findings (informing interested parties before the media) appear to have been breached. These are matters that could well be referenced regardless of the contract in any communication directly with the UWA. The Code lays down the process for UWA to follow.
      However while UWA may seek to balance Code compliance with academic freedom there is the issue of the ARC contract under which L.’s activities have been part funded. It seems that UWA and the U. of NSW also have a responsibility in this regard that are not balanced by academic freedom, and the ARC as funder has a clear interest in breaches. These could all be approached by anyone who feels L.’s work has breached the code (or any other part of the funding agreement) pointing out these obligations are independent of academic freedom.
  • 2012/07/19

    The "skeptic's" Warped World View

    A real defamation from that oh-so-pure Climate Audit:

    achuara Posted Jul 18, 2012 at 4:11 PM | Permalink | Reply
     what about if the “criminals are brought to justice” along with Phil Jones, Mann and the merry bunch? But all boils down to emails and the data released or hacked have not been shown to be altered, or xxxxx –and that is the crux of the issue. They have been xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx data in the Hadley Center for decades, in a clear xxxxxxxx use of public money. But the issue seems to be it was not a leak but a hack! Give me a break!

    For my protection I have decided to remove the worst defamatory words - republishing is as bad a initial publishing

    McIntyre:
    I, for one, don’t believe everything that the police say, just because they say so

    !!!!!!!!!.

    theduke Posted Jul 18, 2012 at 11:54 AM | Permalink | Reply

    The “hack,” if it was a crime, was clearly one of conscience or, if you prefer, an act of civil disobedience. If Mosher and Fuller say it was someone (or more than one) with connections to the CRU, then it’s more likely than not that that is true

    Mosher is more reliable than the police!

    Steve McIntyre Posted Jul 18, 2012 at 12:13 PM | Permalink | Reply 
    Too bad that they didn’t provide any evidence to actually dispel the theory that RC/FOIA “was a disgruntled UEA employee”.

    !!!!!

    Steve McIntyre Posted Jul 18, 2012 at 3:53 PM | Permalink | Reply

    According to Richard Black, Michael Mann has urged that “criminals be brought to justice”:
    ...
    Peter Gleick was apparently unavailable for comment.

    UEA has called the police in to investigate a criminal event (Computer Misuse Act) The police accept that a crime has been committed.

    No one has charged Gleick with a criminal act - this is in the hands of Heartland

    The whole of the blog has turned to innuendo, conspiracy theories and defamatory comments.

    The blocking of comments to these  denialist blogs has become an art form - wordpress must have got some damn fine filtering available to them. It is becoming frustrating!

    2011/04/26

    Oh Dear 4

    More vitriol allowed on WUWT wrt Santer
    Smokey says:  April 25, 2011 at 7:20 pm
    ...
    True dat. Santer is a real vermin, one of the most despicable Climategate worms. This is a real indictment of the formerly great AGU, which has sold its soul to Mammon.
    =============================
    John Blake says: April 25, 2011 at 7:30 pm

    Santer remains a blinkered ideologue, concerned not to promote objective scientific inquiry but to make his Green Gang bones preparatory to foisting willfully ruinous damage on coal, oil, nuclear energy economies in Gaia’s name.

    Whatever Luddite sociopathology drives climate cultists to sabotage human ease-and-comfort at every opportunity, Santer exhibits it in spades. Like Briffa, Hansen, Jones, Mann, Trenberth et al. he is complicit in the most massive, savagely destructive fraud in human history
    ============================
    Pamela Gray says: April 25, 2011 at 7:16 pm

    I’ve been privy to the spectacle of seeing all kinds of accolades being directed to first class jerks. And have sometimes been at the receiving end of “jerk” intelligence and their special kind of superiority. It seems to be a fact of life that those who find being a jerk a rewarding way of life also tend to be at the top of a pile.
    ============================
    And now showing at CA
    Pete  Posted Apr 26, 2011 at 3:50 AM
    You are totally wrong on a number of counts. This body of work has massive impact on public policy and there is continuing public interest, and I would contend a requirement for full disclosure. The University is also a public body and receives grants for it’s work from numerous public sources.

    Apart from this there are significant grounds to suspect dishonest or corrupt practice at this institution.
    ============================
    and
    Henry Posted Apr 27, 2011 at 5:39 AM
    Almost all of these AGW nuts especially academics are card carrying communist the idea that their protecting the sanctity of private property is too funny.
    ============================
    SteveGinIL Posted Apr 24, 2011 at 11:57 PM
    ...
    Lying scientifically means fudging the data, mostly. And no other scientific filed [field?] would give that a pass.
    ============================
    Anthony Watts says:  June 2, 2011 at 6:19 pm

    I’m now of the opinion that Nick Stokes is either disingenuous or deranged in his thought processes, such as selective memory.
    =============================
    Chris Colose
    This is WUWT I guess…whatever


    REPLY: This is Chris Colose, inexperienced student, http://www.aos.wisc.edu/~colose/ whatever. – Anthony
    .......
    You obviously know how I feel about you and your blog, and the level of scientific understanding here, so the insults are pointless. I will do my best to suspend my anger at some of the things people are spoon-fed (and that they actually eat) daily.


    REPLY: You are right, your predictable insults are pointless, so stop it and take it up with Dr. Gray rather than dissing me for publishing his essay at his request. Consensus does not equal fact, and the moment consensus replaces empirically proven facts in science, science is lost. – Anthony

    ....
    REPLY: He’s not at GISS, which is in NYC, he’s in Madison at UW, Home of McIdas and SEIU riots taking over the capital and all that. – Anthony

    ==================

    Joshua says: August 29, 2011 at 11:57 am
    ....
    …simply because you don’t like Pat Michaels and are too much of a coward to put your own full name to posts- Yes he made a gaffe, then corrected it, now move on.

    OK. Pat Michaels isn’t a “coward” because he uses his own name when he writes a comment about only 8 bodies being “coughed up?”

    Gaffe? Really? You call that a “gaffe?”

    And I think that “scrubbed” is more accurate than “correction.” Did he make a statement about his original phrasing, or was his post just silently edited?

    REPLY: Scrubbed would imply removal. Correction is changing words/spelling. Now if you have something to discuss about TV media, then discuss it, otherwise take a hike. I get tired of your thread jackings here. Note the policy page. Note there I state WUWT has a low tolerance level for people using taxpayer funded resources to spout snark from the comfort of anonymity. – Anthony
    -------------------------------
     uknowispeaksense says:
    1. Is this what all the hype was about? A poorly written manuscript yet to be submitted? I am genuinely curious though, which journal does Anthony think this manuscript is going to be published in? The formatting is terrible.

      REPLY:
      We are all still waiting for you to produce something of value other than whining from behind the curtain of anonymity.
      Everyone should have a look at this on his blog to know the kind of person he is: Denier Comment of the Day July 30, 2012
      Step of or shut is always a good policy I think. Write your own paper, make a difference. leave a note when you have substances, because I don’t have to take the sort of juvenile abuse you write on the blog of yours. Not my “living room policy” on the policy page, I’m showing you the door. I’m also going to drop a note to Charles Sturt Univeristy to advise them of your abuse of their AUP. – Anthony
    He's really getting rattled these days:

    James Humbolt says:

    “Moderator REP says:
    August 1, 2012 at 7:52 pm
    Jan P Perlwitz says: August 1, 2012 at 5:54 pm
    Or is this a subtle try to intimidate me by bringing my employer into the argument? BTW: Who do you think is my employer anyway?
    Jeez…. unless the budget cuts bit deeper than we thought or you developed a conscience, everybody and his brother knows you work for NASA/GISS.”
    So once again, the MO here appears to be that if you agree with the work, anonymous review is fine, but as soon as significant or legitimate criticisms appear, you find it necessary to make a point of hunting down and exposing/blackmailing identities. This is DISGUSTING, and of course will not be a tactic available to you in peer review.
    REPLY: Mr. H- whatever. You really want to go this way? Fine. Dr. Perlwitz is well known and well-respected in this community. It really doesn’t matter if he adheres to our “line” or not, he has my respect and that of many others. You can vehemently disagree with him, but if you try to silence him you may run into more of a problem than you thought. Dr. Perlwitz puts his name on his words.
    You, on the other hand, are a sock puppet. Young Mr. Roberts is more than welcome to comment here… but if young Mr. Roberts wants to play stupid games, fine. His information gets dumped. One last warning, Mr. Roberts…. before I was allowed to be a moderator here, I made a comment in seven or eight different languages that in the cold light of morning I begged Charles to remove. Anonymity doesn’t make you free, it makes you stupid. One more humbolt comment like this and your contact information gets published.
    Actually, that’s not gonna happen. but you are pushing the envelope. -REP

    Hmmm -  I seem to remember his email getting published as well - more secret snipping!!!


    2010/11/15

    WUWT - Hatefest

    On WUWT
    November 14, 2010 at 7:56 am
    This blog is becoming a hate-fest of any country apart from US (see the German thread).
    But even worse it is becoming a source of conspiracy theories (communism, socialism UN taking over the world).
    REPLY: Well then don’t visit, nobody’s forcing you. WUWT reports on things people agree and disagree with, I dare say that if I’m not upsetting somebody with some article each day, I’m not doing my job. Get over yourself. – Anthony

    So Watts agrees with the comments on his german post:


    S Basinger says: November 11, 2010 at 8:52 am
    A modest proposal for BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN – perhaps all ‘deniers’ should be made to wear a symbol of some type. Perhaps a star?
    ============
    Dennis Nikols, P. Geol. says: November 11, 2010 at 9:22 am
    Is this significantly different then what we have heard and will continue to hear from any extreme on any subject. Remember the tradition of intolerance for difference runs deep, very deep in the culture of all European societies. We in the US and Canada need to remind ourselves that our culture and society is of European roots.
    ===========
    Allencic says: November 11, 2010 at 9:42 am
    What? The germans are doing stupid and dangerous things again. Where’s General Patton and the Third Army when we need them?
    ============
    kwik says: November 11, 2010 at 10:03 am
     Hmmmm….okay, so germany needs
    - A Secret Police for keeping track of Deniers….let me see …hmm…
    Geheime Clima Polizei ? ( GeCliPo )
    Geheime Grun Polizei ? ( GeGruPo )

    -A way to reckognise the Denier….hmmmm….. A Tatoo on the arm which tell you
    what number you have on the Black List? Like… D 111222 (Denier number 111222)
    And maybe a yellow patch on the chest with a black Coal piece on it ? Easy to spot.

    -There might be neccessary to have some Camps for re-programming of the Deniers.
    Some doctors will be needed for injections of certain drugs. Maybe the deniers can
    work while in camp? Uranium mines?

    -May I suggest a new Jugend organisation ? Die Grune Jugend. You can easily recruit guards for the camps when they are indoctrinaded as young ones.
    ===========
    DesertYote says: November 11, 2010 at 10:06 am
    WOW, just WOW. Reading this right after saying what I did in a post on the Armistice Day thread is chilling.
    The evil of WWI is not dead, its just in hiding … or was :(
    ==========
    Peter Miller says:
    November 11, 2010 at 10:21 am
    Undoubtedly, there are many in Germany who favour the concept of a Fourth Reich.
    History has shown that stifling dissent appears to be ingrained into their culture.
    ===========
    eadler says: November 11, 2010 at 12:26 pm
    Anthony Watts wrote:
    “The seeds of tyranny appear to be taking hold again in the German government at least when it comes to climate change issues. – Anthony”
    I guess Anthony doesn’t know much about German politics. He seems to think the Green Party is running the German government. As far as I know, the ruling party is CDP under Angela Merkel.
    I think that part of the post needs to be corrected.
    REPLY: You have NO IDEA WHAT I THINK. – take a timeout, pretty much fed up with you. – Anthony
    ===========
    Mac The Knife says: November 11, 2010 at 12:48 pm
    Soooooo the zealous German Parliamentarians have issued a fatwa against anyone questioning the absolute truth of Man Made Global Warming, eh? Can Jihad be far behind? If I used the UN-IPCC report to clean my toilet, will they send out their jihadi assassins to murder me
    ===========
    etc........

    17/3/2011
    and his mates are not much better:
    Smokey says: March 17, 2011 at 11:39 am

    thefordprefect says:



    “So you are prepared to subsidise the peasants in their huts with no financial wealth so they can use fossil fuel whose price will rise because of the doubling in demand and the lack of future resources.”
    ...
    But I feel no guilt. If their despotic governments instituted reforms including minimal government interference, free trade, property rights, low taxation, and a fair legal system, within one generation you would see a South Korea-type society emerge from the previous North Korea-type poverty.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    My response (will it make it past the watts knife?


    Personna Smokey the Astroturfer says: March 17, 2011 at 11:39 am

    But I feel no guilt. If their despotic governments instituted reforms including minimal government interference, free trade, property rights, low taxation, and a fair legal system, within one generation you would see a South Korea-type society emerge from the previous North Korea-type poverty.
    Even for an invented personna you are very obnoxious.
    The west has had cheap abundant fuel to grow with. We have squandered this resource and continue to do so - just read the comments here. In the UK just using modern wall warts < 1 watt instead of the usuallo 3 watts would save a small power station. Now swith off all those set top boxes when not reuired and thats another power station. Now switch to efficient lighting and thats another power station.
    Drive a small efficient car, cycle to work, take only one flight holiday per year.
    Insulate your house, stop draughts, reduce the remperature during the winter and increase it in the summer by a degreeC.
    All this is feasible without loosing your freedom and without going back to the dark ages. Is this so much to ask? Wind turbines generate 20% rated power on average over the year. This means you save oil/gas for the future - is this bad?
    I thought personnas were supposed to research before posting. How can you say that ALL lack of industrialisation and wealth is caused by despotic governments - where is your proof. Perhaps you need to bring on line another of your personnas to back up your dross.
    Some aboriginal peoples prefer to be left with their lifestyle. Some may wish to progress to westenrn "civilisation" but because we have squandered to cheap fuel will not be able to reach their aspirations.
    -----------------------
    The response: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/03/17/earth-hour-a-dissent/#comment-623509
    Smokey says:


    March 18, 2011 at 2:12 pm

    thefordprefect [TFP] scolds:

    Drive a small efficient car, cycle to work, take only one flight holiday per year.

    “thefordprefect” persona is a busybody eco-lecturer. I will continue driving my CO2-belching 271 horsepower car. I will never cycle to work, unless it’s on a motorcycle, and I will take as many airline flights as I please – completely guilt free.
    TFP continues:
    Insulate your house, stop draughts, reduce the remperature during the winter and increase it in the summer by a degreeC.
    As if everyone hasn’t heard that a hundred times. I’ve insulated my house to save money and for comfort, not to please little hitler wanna-be’s, who crave a totalitarian government to micro-manage everyone’s life.
    I will keep the temperature where it’s most comfortable, in both summer and winter. I pay for it with my own earned money, and no busybody do-gooder is going to tell me how warm or cool to keep my house.
    All this is feasible without loosing [sic] your freedom and without going back to the dark ages. Is this so much to ask?
    Let me put it this way: Butt out, serf. I will live my life as a free man, paying my own way.
    How can you say that ALL lack of industrialisation and wealth is caused by despotic governments – where is your proof. Perhaps you need to bring on line another of your personnas [sic] to back up your dross.
    First, I can say that all lack of national industrialization is the result of bad government, because it is an obvious fact to the most casual observer. North and South Korea have the same people, the same geography, the same culture. One has good government that embraces the free market [or the Karl Marx term: capitalism], and the other is a Socialist/Communist totalitarian dictatorship. The problem from Albania to Zimbabwe is the same: bad government. The more Socialist/Communist a country’s government is, the worse off its citizens are.
    And second: I have only one on-line persona: Smokey. That’s all. Both you and “walt man” have accused me this past week of having multiple posting names. That is not true. And for someone who names himself after a Douglas Adams character, who are you to criticize?
    There’s a saying: A thief thinks everyone else is a thief. So the probability is high that both TFP and walt man post under various names. I do not. Just because other commentators have criticized TFP’s post as I have, he wrongly assumes that they are me. That is certainly not the case, as those other commentators know.
    Finally, TFP says:
    Some aboriginal peoples prefer to be left with their lifestyle. Some may wish to progress to westenrn “civilisation” but because we have squandered to cheap fuel will not be able to reach their aspirations.
    That is a bunch of horse manure. Every word of it. Some aborigines steer clear of technological civilizations out of fear, because technological civilizations have guns. But every civilization, from stone age to socialist, wants the goodies that come from a free market economy: modern medicine, cheap and abundant food, cheap energy, a huge selection of quality goods and services, electronic gadgets, heated homes, cell phones, you name it. And regarding “squandering” cheap fuel: it is exactly none of TFP’s business what people do with the energy they freely purchase. TFP’s argument is based entirely on his green-eyed envy of prosperous “capitalist” societies.
    TFP is consumed by greed and covetousness. If he could, he would surely confiscate and expropriate the earned wealth of the citizens of “capitalist” countries – simply steal it outright, using any convenient feel-good eco-excuse – and hand it over to the opressive governments he worships, beginning with the UN.
    The despotic leaders would, naturally, pocket TFP’s stolen loot. Their citizens wouldn’t get the benefit, any more than the citizens of Venezuela, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Iran or Zimbabwe get the benefit of the money their leaders intercept and steal.
    TFP no doubt fancies himself as some sort of Robin Hood character. That’s an easy way for a thief to justify his actions. But Robin Hood stole from the bad, and gave to the good – exactly the opposite of what modern eco-thieves intend to do.