No real comment - it's all been said elsewhere:
Showing posts with label antactic ice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label antactic ice. Show all posts
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Stuff from others
-
-
-
Hit and Run16 hours ago
-
-
-
DOE CWG Report “Moot”?2 days ago
-
-
-
-
-
A meta review of the no-longer-new DOE report2 weeks ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
PIOMAS December 20195 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
hit counter
About Me
Popular Posts
-
Not sure about this post. The data used is short The data is noisy Subtracting noisy signals does not improve accuracy!! { UPDATE This... -
Total / opaque cloud vs Temperature No slope on the opaque cloud but a definite dip when teperatures are between 16 and 22C The fo... -
Much rubbish is talked in some locations about how the reference period for anomaly plots is chosen to to create worse temperature rises tha... -
Just for fun! Tony often makes fun of sites removing information. So why not turn the tables! He recently removed this post: A letter ...
-
Question: Is the annual uptake of CO2 by “something” increasing Answer: Yes by 0.17ppm per year Co2 is increasing by 1.6ppm/year for Po...
-
First a combined cycle gas turbine - not known for its efficiency at less than 100% of rated output. http://www.gepower.com/prod_serv/prod... -
Other posts on this subject http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/17/the-steel-greenhouse/ http://climateandstuff.blogspot.co.u... -
I recently posted this on CA http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4804#comment-329759 The plots are from EPICA data, mainly not VOSTOK The time sc...
-
I rather like the mis-quote from the Club of Rome: the mis-quote: http://green-agenda.com/globalrevolution.html “The common enemy of huma... -
False statements are often made about wind turbines (very narrow range of speed over which power is produced; large turbines shut down at lo...
