tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2249983551893842827.post3005911389320792889..comments2023-10-26T23:39:36.158+01:00Comments on Climate and Stuff: EU and Stupid Regulations?thefordprefecthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07210786222021457913noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2249983551893842827.post-58137363311193898512014-09-06T11:59:33.851+01:002014-09-06T11:59:33.851+01:00O bugger, I thought this was Victor Venema's s...O bugger, I thought this was Victor Venema's site....instead I find myself talking to a motor car. <br /> The Ford Prefect. Still, it was an oldie but a goodie. Any kid of the 50's would have travelled around in one of those,.... myself about a dozen times.,... great fun.Macknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2249983551893842827.post-31414828664999614102014-08-27T03:12:17.939+01:002014-08-27T03:12:17.939+01:00Exactly bill hartree,... Roy Spencer is a "lu... Exactly bill hartree,... Roy Spencer is a "luke-warmer" He is listed as precisely that on Watt's site in that right-hand column. If Watts were to classify himself on his own blog he would be right alongside Roy Spencer. Now whether or not they have adopted this "luke- warming" position in an effort to preserving the climate arguement and hence their blog-sites, or just to throw a bone to the true believers, is the moot point. That they have spent all their lives studying, blogging, debating, researching, or even merely just stating the words "greenhouse" gas, puts them in a very difficult position. Are these 2 individuals just going to say..."Oh, sorry, the slayers were right, there are no greenhouse gases, many apologies, let's all go home now and close all the blogs." ?<br />So Spencer and Watts are trying to have their cake and eat it. But they both are now in an untenable position . In this AGW arguement, you either support the IPCC and the "Greenhouse' effect,and all the numbers and methods of science they say, or say, no, this is wrong. Their numbers are wrong.<br />You cannot just sit on the fence like Watts and Spencer and say "Ill just have a little bit of "greenhouse" effect please. Just a little bit of an anthropogenic effect....surely?" Sitting on the fence like this suddenly divests yourself of any numbers and figures to support your stance..you're just wafting around in no-mans land with nothing concrete in the way of numbers, or in fact nothing but a thought experiment in the way of science. Macknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2249983551893842827.post-9144802495073839232014-08-26T17:24:51.809+01:002014-08-26T17:24:51.809+01:00Mack, Whether or not Climate Change is crap, your ...Mack, Whether or not Climate Change is crap, your attempt at demonstrating this assertion is incredibly stupid. Spencer is actually saying that people who claim that there is no such thing as the Greenhouse Effect are wrong. <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2249983551893842827.post-18700274166841671312014-08-26T11:00:45.067+01:002014-08-26T11:00:45.067+01:00Climate Change is crap....
http://www.drroyspencer...Climate Change is crap....<br />http://www.drroyspencer.com/2013/05/time-for-the-slayers-to-put-up-or-shut-up/#comment-78670Macknoreply@blogger.com